The Death of Deadspin and The Pleasure of the Text

Everyone who worked for Deadspin quit yesterday. If you’re not familiar with Deadspin, very little of what follows may interest you. But it should.

Ostensibly a sports website, part of what is left of long-ago Gawker Media, Deadspin was, for me at least, pretty much a daily must-read. Not so much because of what its writers had to say about sports, but in spite of what they were required to say about sports. Fans like me reveled in Deadspin because it was home to a lot of damned good and very entertaining writing, most notably that of the site’s indisputable star and Minnesota-native, Drew Magary, who has also quit.

Why the exodus? Well, mostly for a numbingly familiar-to-the-point-of-cliched reason. Several months ago, you see, Deadspin was bought up by a crew of – wait for it — private equity “investors.” We’ll call them “vultures.” In this case known as Great Hill Partners.

In the interests of quickly maximizing their profit margins, Great Hill installed new management and the leadening editorial horror began soon thereafter.

Instead of encouraging and amplifying what made Deadspin irresistible — imaginative, free-wheeling, provocative commentary in which sports were treated like a facet of the much broader cultural landscape and not some walled-off, brain dead island where the wide, weird world never intruded — Great Hill Partners was determined to, uh, “focus” directly on sports. And just sports.

As in “Stick to sports, damn it.”

Here’s Deadspin explaining what happened then.

As if anyone anywhere was pleading for another site “focused” on why the Cleveland Browns are so bad again this year. Or how Alabama might win another football championship. Or who the Yankees will gobble up off the free agent market. What the Great Hills brain trust saw as a sure winner money-wise was exactly the kind of symbiotic boilerplate “coverage” every other daily sports page, local sports talk station and sports website belabors every goddam day and goddam minute of the goddam year.

Here’s a sample — from Deadspin writer David Roth — of what Great Hill Partners wanted stopped and why it suddenly finds itself without a staff.

“When Trump went to Game 5 of the World Series and was booed and jeered and subjected to a personalized version of the same idiot chant that America’s sourest grandparents and most goal-oriented small-business fascistsdelight in doing at his rallies, the codependent relationship between our broken politics and busted media blossomed into a public display of affection. The incident itself was unremarkable and unsurprising in itself. People jeered and booed Trump because Trump is historically unpopular, and because jeering and booing have historically been popular ways of getting that message across. Even a crowd of monied sports fans and establishment D.C. mutants could not turn down the opportunity to tell one of recent history’s most repellent figures how repellent they found him. It’s an exceedingly rare opportunity, too, because Trump is a priggish and buttery germaphobe who eschews not just the demeaning rigors of retail politics but any occasion at which he might be treated with less than absolute servility and adoration.”

And here’s Magary — who also writes for GQ and will not be out of work for long — in a epic rant days prior to the 2016 election.

“[Trump] will never answer for his crimes, and there’s a frighteningly large portion of the electorate that will always love him for that.

And so I’d just like to say to that portion of the electorate: Fuck you. No, seriously. Go fuck yourselves. I’m not gonna waste any more time trying to convince you that you’re about to do something you’ll regret forever. I’m not gonna show you old clips of Trump saying rotten things. I’m not gonna try to ANNIHILATE Trump by showing you records of his hypocrisy and greed. I’m not gonna link to a John Oliver clip and be like, “THIS. So much this.” Nothing’s gonna take down Trump at this point, so I’m not gonna bother. No no, this post is for ME. I am preaching to the sad little choir in my soul here. … Trump is human waste. He is the worst of America stuffed into a nacho cheese casing, and he is emblematic of the kind of arrogant, flag-waving, trashy, racist moron that the rest of us have to DRAG kicking and screaming into the 21st century: Cliven Bundy, Sean Hannity, Kim Davis, and on and on and on. Trump voters are the people who have spent the past decade or so voting insipid obstructionists into office, sending death threats to anyone who even mentions the idea of gun control, demanding 100% tax cuts on millions of dollars they can only daydream about making, and getting suckered in by any Oil Party candidate waving a NO GAYS flag. Fuck them. These are needy hillbilly loons who are just as starved for attention as Trump himself.”

(Magary’ annual NFL pre-season breakdown, “Why Your Team Sucks” were invariably classics.)

So yeah, Deadspin was kind of “sports-plus.” Sports covered and commented on in the context of everything happening today, and without apology.

And I say that as someone who enjoys sports, but grinds my teeth any time I have to pretend that sports matter. They don’t. They’re a game. An entertainment. A distraction. What matters is all around sports, in the minds … somewhere … of most of the fans in the stadiums or on the couch. Despite what some color commentator might say sports are not quarantined off in a psychological cell block immune to what … well, to what’s happening on the planet outside the ballpark.

What’s emblematic in the death of Deadspin-we-as-we-knew-it is the pervasive blandifying of journalism in so many other forms. In the trade there’s something known as “service journalism”, a form of the media art in which everyone seeks to get along and make each other happy. Advertisers buy advertising and publishers, editors and writers produce provocation-free copy to enhance the appeal of that advertising. I refer you to almost any local business magazine, city magazine and “consumer-oriented” website. (I’ve written for them all. )

The bleed-over from those examples of what used to be known as “advertorial content” into “real journalism” is a belief that the criteria for quality reporting — on any topic — is that it be as provocation-free, as “fair and balanced”, as predictable and quotidian, as rote and humor-free as the private equity vultures demanded Deadspin be … or else.

The fact that it’s not particularly enjoyable to read is amost what proves its bona fides.

In some dystopian fantasies a mad scientist experiment goes awry and every organism on the planet is reduced to the same grey mush. I’ve thought of this bumping into the occasional Star Tribune reporter. There’s this eery Stepford quality to the younger ones. Each speaks, in casual conversation mind you, with the same semi-robotic, self-consciously moderating vernacular, careful to say little to nothing, and never anything funny. Which alas, is how they also write. Grey and bland.

(The irony there is that in my experience at least, these young reporters have clearly been hire to fill a widely diverse range. Racially, gender and sexual orientation-wise, they’re different. But in terms of their diversity of thought-processes and the ways they collate information … they’re virtually identical.)

A few weeks ago I was watching the “Special Features” end of a DVD of one of my favorite movies, “The Conformist” by Bernardo Bertolucci. In an interview, Bertolucci was talking about the occasional odd bit of comic physicality his male lead, Jean-Louis Trintignant, would throw into a scene.

At first Bertolucci couldn’t see himself using that particular take. Trintignant’s character is a haunted man, not particularly humorous. But, says Bertolucci, as he edited the film he was eventually reminded of French critic/philosopher Roland Barthe’s, “The Pleasure of the Text”, and the idea that serious work needs the element of pleasure — the touch of humor, hyperbole, vulgarity even — to make it more accessible and vital to the reader or audience.

Rather than a liability, the “inappropriate” is essential.

I hadn’t thought of Barthes since college. But the “pleasure of the text”, the willingness and ability to draw in and hold an audience, sometimes with the unlikely and unpredictable, sometimes with the outrageous and profane, is what made Deadspin (we knew it) so unique and so valuable.

“Roseanne” and Sinclair Take Network TV Tribal

Despite what we’ve been learning about Facebook and its power to deliver “fake news”, it’s worth keeping in mind that your fellow Americans (‘Muricans) still get most of their news, fake or otherwise, from their local TV stations. That’s according to a Pew survey from last summer.

As we digest the power of “Fox and Friends” to guide White House policy, the startling ratings for the revival of “Roseanne” and hilarious-to-appalling mash-up video of Sinclair Broadcasting anchors parroting a Orwellian script from upper management, we need to remind ourselves about how basic monetization drives our rancid tribalism.

The Sinclair video, a brilliant piece of agit-prop by a guy named Tim Burke at the sports web-site Deadspin, (which would be required reading if only for Minnesota native Drew Magary), went viral in about an hour late last week. It is the sort of thing that will laser-etch itself on the reputation of every Sinclair anchor who agreed to perform it. Something so robotic, so herd-like and craven will remain a millstone on their well-coiffured heads for the remainder of their careers. (To date, I see only one Sinclair anchor, in liberal Seattle, who has dared make any criticism of her employer.)

Having spent years observing the folkways and the compromises local TV news personalities make to sustain what still are well-paying jobs, I gotta say laying their faces out there and reading a double-think script ordered by the home office doesn’t surprise me in the least. It is what they are paid to do. The local TV anchor gig is far (far) less about journalism than it is about acting out the marketing strategies of CEOs and boards of directors.

I no longer have access to the deeper internals of Nielsen ratings, but a bit like newspapers, the broad audience for your local TV news was on the decline 15 years ago and there’s no indication that has stopped. (The most reliable figure shows a 31% decline in audience for local TV news since 2007.) But even back then, local TV news was very much a demographics game, designed (scripted and performed) for the primary consumer in traditional households … thirty-something “soccer moms”, with a kind of ancillary focus on an older audience holding hard to loyalties to their favorite hometown TV “stars”.

What’s fascinated me in the past few days, with the return of “Roseanne” on ABC and Sinclair’s Trump-echoing about “false news”, is how much traditional network television — by that I mean primetime sitcoms and dramas — and the local news that bookends are becoming segmented and segregated for service to specific tribal attitudes, like just about everything else in 2018 media.

Despite the high-minded sounding rhetoric from Sinclair’s VP for news, there’s nothing remotely unbiased about the company’s mission as it buys up more and more local TV stations.

For example:

Says Olivia Nuzzi in New York magazine today: “David Smith, the executive chairman of Sinclair Broadcast Group, said he dislikes and fundamentally distrusts the print media, which he believes ‘serves no real purpose ‘. In e-mails to New York, Smith said that print — as in newspapers and magazines — is a reality-distorting tool of leftists. Print media, he said, has ‘no credibility’ and no relevance.

‘I must tell that in all the 45 plus years I have been in the media business I have never seen a single article about us that is reflective of reality especially in today’s world with the shameful political environment and generally complete lack of integrity. Facts and truth have been lost for a long time and likely to never return’, Smith said.

‘The print media is so left-wing as to be meaningless dribble which accounts for why the industry is and will fade away. Just no credibility.”

Good lord.

It would be so refreshing if Sinclair would simply step up and say, “Yeah, we’re your Trump TV group. You like Trump? Stick with us. We’ll give you news that will reassure you you’re on to something yuge and great.”

Sinclair wants to ride/exploit the Trump crest among his believers. It sees good money to be made — shareholder value — serving the preferences (ok, “biases”) of conservative viewers, in particular viewers who maintain a loyalty to traditional network programming and the traditional forms of “news”.

And folks, there’s no law against that. It is, as I like to say, The First Rule of Show Biz: “Give the People What They Want.”  Or, to fine tune that a bit, “Figure out where the audience is for the story you want to tell and drag them into your tent.”

What I’d be interested in seeing today is a survey about the political leanings of the folks Sinclair is betting on — tradition-oriented entertainment and news consumers — as well as the millions of others (and counting) who have largely given up on primetime network TV and local TV news in favor of content that is both more “adult” and, as news goes, less worried about being accused of bias. I’m guessing your the audiences for network and cable (other than FoxNews) is now definably tribal.

I say this as someone who never watched entire episode of “Roseanne” in its hey day, (and I was a TV critic at the time), and hasn’t watched a primetime network show since “Lost” went off the air. For good reason Sinclair Broadcasting has no interest in me. But neither does it have any interest in all the rest of you who have migrated over to Netflix, FX, AMC, HBO, MSNBC, podcasts and the vast, burgeoning universe of alternatives to … stale, timid tradition.

Likewise, my (and I suspect a lot of your) consumption of local TV news has cratered over the past decade. Simply put, local TV news a product that has negligible value to a news consumer like me. (That is to say: Smug, cranky, aged liberal elitist.) Everything about local TV news is compromised to avoid stirring conflict from any quarter. The fact that almost no local TV newscast anywhere in the country dares assert and regularly remind viewers about the human impact on climate change is as conclusive an example as you need for the scripted, tightly coordinated insipidness of the overall product.

But … there is an audience that remains simultaneously resistant to “adult” entertainment and can be reassured by the blandness and celebrity appeal of local TV personalities. That crowd may continue to wane. (“Die off” is a more apt description.) But the bet by Sinclair as it buys up local stations and imposes highly centralized editorial content and viewpoint on them, mirrors what the networks themselves are no doubt looking to capture in the wake of “Roseanne’s” fire. Namely, cash in on Trumpist America while it is still a hardened, easily-defined tribe.

(I predict a Ted Nugent-Scott Baio sit-com in the near future).

There’s got to be at least another decade worth of good profits in giving traditional America what it wants to see.