Who’s “Pro” and Who’s “Con’ About “Don’t Look Up”?

I can’t say how telling it is. But there’s a sociologically and culturally interesting schism currently on display over the Netflix movie, “Don’t Look Up.” Maybe you’ve seen it. Maybe you thought it was hilarious. Or important. Or heavy-handed. Or so unspeakably dull you turned it off 10 minutes after Leonardo Di Caprio and Jennifer Lawrence discover a Mt. Everest-size comet heading straight for Earth.

Movies, like music and fashion and every other damn thing you can think of comes with a lot of subjectivity. “Consider the source” is usually the best you can say about someone calling “Transformers 4” “really cool” and “2001: A Space Odyssey”, “unbelievably dull, except for the monkeys at the beginning.”

“Don’t Look Up”, is a star-packed satire of modern America’s utter inability to take anything seriously. Not even to the point of uniting long enough to deflect our own doom. Released Christmas Eve, it has not just dropped a cleaver between the usual tribes. It has also divided a majority of critics from a generally pretty bright chunk of the audience.

Because it is ambitious, and energetic and full of ideas and more than a little angry, it is also illuminating the short-comings of another sub-set of modern America.

The film is the latest from Adam McKay, a guy with a very long list of producing and directing credits, including “Talladega Nights: The Legend of Ricky Bobby”, HBO’s “Succession”, “The Big Short”, “Vice” (the Dick Cheney story) and the two “Anchorman” movies. McKay is as Ron Burgundy would say, “kind of a big deal.”

So big that Cate Blanchett, Jonah Hill, Mark Rylance, Ariana Grande, Timothee Chalamet, Tyler Perry and Meryl Streep, (as the Trumpier-than-Trump POTUS) and a dozen others signed on at fees significantly below their starring rates.

With the mere mention of that list of names, the MAGA crowd is already on its hind legs howling about “liberal Hollywood elites”.

Hence you get this from The National Review: “Don’t Look Up is Netflix’s evasive, misstated excuse for political satire that fails very badly because writer-director Adam McKay doesn’t grasp his own political prejudices. Unlike Jude, McKay has no real sense of humor, just sophomoric ridicule. He brazenly broadcasts the entitled sense of obnoxiousness encouraged in Hollywood or Broadway environs, where liberalism has turned into progressivism. And as essayist David Horowitz observed, “inside every progressive is a totalitarian screaming to get out.” [The guy’s quoting David Horowitz with a straight face. Jeeezus.]

And then there’s the far-from-Hollywood-and-only-dreaming-I-was-elites, like me, who find it hilarious. And not just the Streep White House. Where characters can’t focus on doomsday because of bad polling over (and looming mid-terms) over a lunk-headed Supreme Court candidate revealed as a one-time porn actor (with whom POTUS once canoodled). That’s funny. But better, richer and even more relevant is the dead-on, can’t be over-stated satire of a culture so addled by entertaining itself it has lost the ability to find seriousness in anything that doesn’t deliver celebrity-scented sex appeal, charm and, you know, constant distraction from “all that ugly stuff out there.”

Beyond the salaried critics who have given it a low 55% score on Rotten Tomatoes, most complaining about “lack of focus”, “heavy-handedness”, “too long” and how it is “aggressively mean-spirited and smug”, there’s the social media backlash, (ironically a constant target of the movie.)

Here’s a hot take from a local PR guy: “Just watched the worst movie we have seen in five years. Make it 10. It’s on Netflix and is called ‘Don’t Look Up’. Everyone in its all-star cast should be embarrassed. Storyline, acting, concept all awful. Total waste of time!”

And these responses from his “friends.”

“It was a weird one… that presidential role played by Streep turned me off and tuned me out. I can’t believe an HOFer like her signed off on this.” [Who remembers The Orange God King calling Streep “overrated”?]

“Yep, it’s a total satire & sad whim of Hollywood’s elite directed at a young audience. Several of my educated & arts-cultured friends under 40 loved it.”

And this from someone who obviously had no trouble identifying with the film’s fattest targets, “What, you didn’t like a bunch of Hollywood snobs telling us how stupid we are?!?”

Now, as I say, people disagree about everything … all the time … (another point McKay plays with.) But the need to jump out and get on record … about a movie … is interesting and kinda goads me into the following conjecture.

Among all our tribes, there is the one I refer to as the Traditionalists. They’re a significant bunch.

In my experience over lo these many years this crowd works its way into respected institutions because they have some talent. But primarily, they clean up well, show up and do exactly the job they were hired to do. Soon upon arrival they burrow into the bureaucracy and usually flourish … because they, like their institution, they respect and never seriously question the status quo.

“Challenging” equals trouble.

Basic fact of life here: institutional movie critics are expected to be in step with the institution’s audience. Those who regularly wet their pants over obscure Bulgarian dramas are usually not hired to begin with, and certainly find themselves in a difficult place, newsroom-wise, if they can’t get on board with the latest “Spiderman Returns for the Fourteenth Time” re-boot.

Other Traditionalists include people who have respected the norms of American commerce, especially of the media-manipulation variety, where the status quo sells things to each other, again something McKay ridicules with exuberant relish. “Don’t Look Up” is an almost wall-to-wall mockery of The Great American Shill. The arena where people are products and ideas are interchangeable frostings.

My bet with “Don’t Look Up” — which I’m not saying competes with “Citizen Kane”, “The Seventh Seal” or “2001” in terms of art, (although there’s a heavy dose of “Dr. Strangelove” at play here) — is that it is one of those cultural artifacts that will grow in popular estimation as the months and years go by.

I.e. “cult status.” (We can sell that!)

‘Don’t Look Up” is the sort of thing Traditional minds may never accept as anything but “terrible”. But it I strongly suspect so many others appreciate it they’ll turn it into a cultural touchstone. A “classic.” Thereby, long after first blush, embarrassing those refusing to see the sad comedy of the world around them.

14 thoughts on “Who’s “Pro” and Who’s “Con’ About “Don’t Look Up”?

  1. On its way to “classic” status, you say? I don’t see that happening, but perhaps your crystal ball has less static on it than mine. I’m pretty sure I’m on the side of the cultural/political divide that was supposed to like this movie, and in a handful of places I did. It made me laugh intermittently. I’m pretty sure I “got” the message. But for the most part it struck me as aimless and disjointed and over-the-top, more noise than substance. In sum: I though the movie’s “point” was lost in the clutter of making it over and over and over again, each time a little more clumsily than the last. But, like I said, I did laugh now and then.

    • I’m sticking with my call. As I say, McKay will never be confused with Ozu, Kurosawa, Bergman or Kubrick, but there were moments with so many jabs and jokes within the frame, I wanted to hit pause and rewind — which I may do soon. BTW, I watched Ridley Scott’s “The Last Duel”, a colossal bomb. THAT is a good movie.

    • The Last Duel is one of the worst films I’ve seen. Stupid writing (Affleck and Damon), wooden acting and a tedious triple telling of a rape. At one point Damon and his soon to be raped wife are admiring a white mare he’s bought for breeding when a big black stallion breaks loose and mounts the mare. Oooh, a deep symbol. Supposedly a sensitive treatment of a woman not being believed, it’s a sophomoric male view of women (they brought in a woman co-writer but it doesn’t show) with the whole thing awash in testosterone. Critics have loved it. I was bored times 3.

      • Ouch! Tough crowd. And here I kept thinking of you when I wondered who cut Ben Affleck’s hair?

  2. Good one Brian, and I agree, critics on both ends are going to look stupid on this as environmental apocalypse unfolds.

    • Thx. I can’t disagree with people who complain that the movie is messy and sprawling. I doubt it was conceived or ever thought of as high “film art.” But it intended — and succeeded — in packing a merciless punch. Good to hear from you. Hope you’re well.

  3. Interesting bunch of contributors! Especially fun for me to hear from Bill Souder! Long time! 🙂 I’m with you, Brian, that Mckay will never be confused Kurosawa, Bergman or Kubrick, but I would argue that he’s a different kind of filmmaker, a) far less interested in the visual image, and b) far more interested in addressing current day issues rather than timeless issues. I see “Don’t Look Up” reaching cult status, rather than classic, largely because this one made me laugh rather than made me think. But I think McKay’s contributions to the cultural conversation are actually Underrated. “Vice” is in my opinion one of the least appropriately appreciated films of our time: it should be taught in the schools. And I suspect his contribution to “Succession” immeasurable. In my opinion, he does already belong in that “list of the revered.”

    • I think I should have been a bit more specific about what I mean by “classic.” “Cult classic” is the more appropriate prediction. A movie that sticks in the general consciousness and becomes a kind of short hand for craven venality.

  4. Watched it last night. I thoroughly enjoyed it, although certainly not “great”. Actually reminded me a lot of one of my other favorite cult classics, “Dogma” (a movie I used to watch with my children every Christmas Day). Not sure if you noticed, but at the end of “Don’t Look Up” as we see the detritus of the world flashing by, there is a golden Mooby calf that flies by….clearly a tribute to “Dogma” and the “Clerks” movies!
    ( https://kevin-smith.fandom.com/wiki/Mooby_the_Golden_Calf )

    • There is so much stuff like that flying by. I got fixated on the portraits on the White House walls.

Comments are closed.