Moderates Must Accept Some Responsibility for Abortion Ban

“This is Democrats’ fault too, because they’re so bad at messaging.”  This is the go-to blame-shifting critique I get from self-identified “moderate” friends, well-intentioned folks who dodge conflict, critical thinking, and/or accountability by continually declaring equal disgust for “both sides.”

In the wake of the leak of the forthcoming U.S. Supreme Court decision allowing states to ban abortions, I’m hearing this a lot. It’s hardly the first time.  I hear it every time there is another preventable mass shooting, and every time some jaw droppingly stupid piece of legislation passes, such as “don’t say gay” teacher censorship or something that further aggravates climate change.

The moderates’ flippant “this is Democrats’ fault too, because they suck at messaging argument” is patently ridiculous responsibility avoidance.

Let’s start with the “this Democrats’ fault too” part of their claim. To state the obvious, Democrats didn’t appoint the justices overturning Roe. Republicans did. Democrats didn’t vote for the politicians who appointed those abortion-banning justices. Republicans and moderates did.  So, where is moderates’ unambiguous criticism of Republicans?

Because these facts are so undeniable and damning, moderates, ever-wary of decisively taking a side on an issue, quickly shift to the “yeah, but Democrats are to blame too because they can’t message” condemnation.  This invariably gets the moderate bobbleheads nodding in self-righteous agreement.

I don’t buy that either. As for messaging effort, while conflict averse moderates too often have been silent on the sidelines of the unpleasant abortion debate, Democrats have been leading the fight for reproductive health rights for decades, including in the largest protest in American history.

Democrats have even been fighting for abortion rights in jurisdictions where they know it will hurt them politically.  For example, my former boss Tom Daschle lost his reelection bid in no small part because he courageously stood up for reproductive freedom in a state where he knew doing so would hurt him.

Beyond an alleged lack of messaging effort, moderates also criticize Democrats’ messaging skills

My question back to moderates: “Tell me, have you discovered the magic words that convince your anti-abortion friends to preserve Roe? If so, could you please share them? Has any human being on the planet come up with those magically persuasive words? 

Market researchers tell us there are words and arguments that seem to work better than others. But they still don’t change many minds.

If the magic words don’t seem to exist, maybe messaging skills isn’t the problem here.

Maybe the audience, not the messaging, is the problem.  Maybe the audience is unpersuadable on this issue.

This “it’s Democrats’ fault because they suck at messaging” line of blame-shifting is not just irksome, it’s one of the root causes of the coming abortion ban.  The moderates’ mindless, self-indulgent “both sides are equally bad” and “why should I support them if they can’t message” viewpoints frees moderates to continue using their election-swinging votes to empower Republicans. 

Too many moderates give Republicans their votes, often out of greed, because there is a tax cut promised, or out of shallowness, because of some kind of an irrelevant personality preference. They subsequently express shock and dismay when the Republicans they helped elect do the things they promised they would do on the campaign trail, such as making abortion illegal, censoring teachers, opposing gun background checks, blocking efforts to make health care and child care more affordable, and effectively empowering white supremacists and insurrectionists.

While all of us, including congressional Democrats, could and should get better at messaging on these issues, let’s not kid ourselves. The primary reason abortion is about to be banned in about half of the states isn’t messaging. The primary problem is that there are too many Republican extremists in office. That happens in part because there are too many moderates giving them their votes. That happens because there are too many moderates rationalizing their votes for extremist Republicans with self-delusional “both sides are equally bad” arguments. 

So the next time you hear moderates say something bad is happening because Democrats suck at messaging, please stop nodding your heads, and hold them accountable.

This entry was posted in Poltiics by Joe Loveland. Bookmark the permalink.

About Joe Loveland

I've worked for politicians, a PR firm, corporations, nonprofits, and state and federal government. Since 2000, I've run a PR and marketing sole proprietorship. I think politics is important, maddening, humorous and good fodder for a spirited conversation. So, I hang out here when I need a break from life.

4 thoughts on “Moderates Must Accept Some Responsibility for Abortion Ban

  1. “Too many moderates give Republicans their votes, often out of greed, because there is a tax cut promised, or out of shallowness, because of some kind of an irrelevant personality preference.” SO TRUE, Joe. And yes, it’s our responsibility to stand up that inane comment that “both sides are equally at fault.” It hasn’t been true for a long long time. I say it straight out… “We don’t lie like they do, and yes, nobody’s perfect and everybody lies. Still, hypocrisy is abhorrent to the average democrat, and hypocrisy is perfectly acceptable way of life for the average republican. It wasn’t always like that. But it is now, and until we realize it, and embrace it as fact, we will be impotent in our efforts to counter them.

    • Richard Nixon initiated or accepted the creation of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Clean Air Act, the Endangered Species Act, the Water Pollution Control Act, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the Office of Consumer Affairs, and Amtrak. Can you imagine if a Republican did that now? Fifty years later, the gravitational center of the GOP has almost no policy ideas beyond a border wall and billionaire tax giveaway, and spends all of his time and energy blackballing any otherwise loyal Trumpist Republican who doesn’t endorse every syllable of every outrageous lie.

      This is not the Republican Party I knew growing up. This is not an alternative policy viewpoint. It’s a creepy cult. Refusal to acknowledge that is self-delusional and dangerous for our democracy.

  2. I think that the logical, end result of your argument is that these people generally, are not moderates. They just like being called moderates, because that is their self image. They have been voting their self interest, and they likely will continue to do so. Which means that the polls you cite are probably wrong.

    Sure, maybe in the best of all possible worlds they would prefer that Roe not be overturned, but the truth is that they really do not care all that much. They know that they (or, more exactly, their daughters) will be able to get a safe abortion, and that is what matters to them. The rest of the people….? Who cares? I’ll be alright.

    Which, in my opinion, brings us sort of full circle…that the real problem is the Democrats messaging skills are sorely lacking. Because we as a society will not be alright as long as some of us have to get back alley abortions, or some of us need to fear mass shooting, or some of us are targeted by racist violence. And until we are able to convince a significant majority of our population that we are only as strong as the weakest among us, we are in trouble. A house divided can not stand….

    • I definitely agree about your observations about moderates. “Self-described” is an important modifier. It’s self-styled brand for how they want to be regarded.

      And yes, for most moderates tax cuts for themselves are a voting issue, while things impacting The Others are not.

      Where I disagree with you is on Democrats’ messaging being the primary problem. I’m considered to be a pretty good PR guy. I’ve done it for 35 years. I have studied the marketing research on this issue search for a better way. I’ve come to the conclusion that that there is no way I can say anything that will change the mind of an abortion opponent. Humbling as that is, Carville, Meacham, Luntz, Laskow, Obama, Bill Clinton, Fetterman, Ocasio-Cortez, Wellstone, Katie Porter, Axelrod, Plouffe, Sherrod Brown, and other highly regarded messaging geniuses aren’t proving any more persuasive than I am.

      I’m a big believer in the power of strategic communications, but there are huge effectiveness limitations when it comes to an issue has been exhaustively debated and propagandized like this one. That’s getting to be true on more and more issues. If I can’t come up with the magic words that change fully cured hearts and minds, and the pros I most admire can’t either, I’m not going to blame others for that.

Comments are closed.